20th March 2019: Thinking about methods


Smith & Dean (2009) describe the practice-led research as a two-fold approach of “creative work in itself [as] a form of research and [a] generat[or] [of] detectable research outcomes” and of “creative practice [as] the training and specialist knowledge that creative practitioners have and the processes they engage with… lead[ing] to specialist insights”

I would be inclined to split this into a triple articulation of creative practice – the application of knowledge and processes, studio practice as research method, and the development of creative outcomes. however, this triple articulation can be difficult to elucidate clearly as each affects the others, often in reflexive and looping ways. Artists are train to catenate (from chemistry: to connect in series in chains or rings) concept ideas, visual influences, text etc. in what can often seem to outside observers as a capricious fashion, often following their intuition.

The application of intuition in a vigorous research context may be seen as flimsy but I want to make an argument that by framing the cyclic creative process as hacking, the artist and other creative practitioners can trace and track their intuitive leaps.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s